Search toggle
2026 AS Election

WWU students are saying NO.

These are 2026 AS election candidates who are publicly saying NO to the Spring 2026 WWU Athletics Fee Referendum.

Candidates Saying NO

Student leaders taking a public position against the sports referendum.

This page helps students see which AS candidates have publicly opposed the new $80.36 per quarter athletics fee. Each candidate featured here is connected to the broader question facing WWU: whether student money should go toward another athletics fee or toward the services students use every day.

Real Vikings is sharing these candidate positions so students can compare where candidates stand on affordability, transparent budgeting, and basic student services.

Public Candidate Positions Each candidate listed here is publicly saying NO to the sports referendum.
Clear Position Each entry should clearly state support for voting NO on the athletics fee referendum.
Document-Sourced Claims Numbers and factual claims should stay tied to official WWU or ASWWU documents.
Featured Candidates

Student candidates putting services first

These candidates are speaking publicly about affordability, student services, and the need to prioritize students as WWU faces rising fees, course cuts, and a $23 million structural deficit.

No candidates saying NO are listed in this category yet.
Stay Connected

Want to add your name or get involved?

Use this form if you want to say NO publicly, help with outreach, or ask about the candidates listed on this page. We will follow up before posting any personal statement publicly.

  1. Tell us who you are. Include your preferred name, email, and WWU relationship.
  2. Share why you are saying NO. Keep it short, direct, and tied to affordability or student services.
  3. We will confirm before posting. Nothing submitted here will be published as a quote without follow-up.

Say NO to the Sports Referendum

Send your name, WWU relationship, and a short statement about why you oppose the athletics fee referendum.